The game of Dominion is fairly popular at the commune. It is a dynamic card game, and a sister of Magic in that you build decks and the rules are changing all the time. These kinds of game are pretty complex and they are part of our informal home schooling curriculum. The fact that our kids want to play, because our adults are playing and because if they play well they can be peers to the adults, are big pluses.
When i first started playing Dominion with Sami he was not yet 5. Despite being involved in his home school efforts, i dont keep track of where kids are in the educational process by what age they are at. It is just not something i think about.
One evening Sami and some older kids wanted to play Dominion. We each choose some of the perhaps 200 different card types we have in the various expansions so we could create a game. Sami choose a couple of card types he liked as did everyone else. There was a bit of negotiating to get some better game dynamics on the board. All friendly negotiations.
Sami played well, i barely beat him and i was the overall winner. He got more points than several other kids and adults.
I was talking with Ezra, Sami’s dad, the following day (who Sami had recently beaten) and complimenting his clever kid. “Yeah, it is pretty impressive.” Confessed Ez. “Given that he can’t read the cards.”
“What?” i said
“He can’t read yet. But he really wanted to play. So he memorized all the cards so he could play.” Ez explained.
“But there are like 200 different cards, and some are crazy complicated.” i was amazed.
“Like i said, he really wanted to play.”
It was the bad old days of the Reagan Administration. i was living in Santa Cruz and rapidly ditching my liberal Democrat roots and becoming an anarcho-feminist.
Reagan wanted to reward his campaign contributing oil company friends. So he proposed permitting off shore oil leases on the California coast. This was fantastically unpopular among Californians.
Still Reagan wanted to pretend that there was concern for the public’s opinion and he sent his secretary of Interior, Don Hodel to talk with the people of Santa Cruz. Hodel brought with him some oil company PR flacks who showed how this oil 1) was desperately needed and 2) how the major oil companies had a great record with safe recovery of oil from off shore and 3) had no real alternative. The audience was totally not buying it.
At the last minute Rabbit and i decided to go to the public hearing. It was jammed. So was the list of people who wanted to comment critically on the presentations of the oil companies and the secretary of the interior.
Rabbit was not deterred. He went up and spoke to the moderator of the event. He promised he would talk for less than 30 seconds. He would wait for his moment and when the moderator signaled him he we jump up quickly. The moderator being a flexible Santa Cruz type permitted this extraordinary action.
When Rabbits 15 seconds of super stardom was signaled he jumped to the podium. “Secretary Hodel, as you can tell by the comments in this room the plan for off shore oil drilling is fantastically unpopular here in California. So i have just two things to say to you. 1) There are some people in this room who will stop you any way they legally can”
“2) And there are other people in this room, who will stop you anyway they can.” Rabbit bounded from the room and it took the moderator well over 30 seconds to get the room to calm down.
No additional oil drilling took place off the California coast.
Over the years, they’ve been hired by a long list of impressive and, for an anarchist collective, unlikely seeming clients. Then, in 2006, they were approached by one the biggest banks in Latin America and Spain. It was suffering from organizational malaise and wanted help for fueling innovation in its ranks. Las Indias took the job and, after analyzing the situation, decided, like the good transnational anarchists that they are, that the bank was suffering from two major ills: they had too much hierarchy and they were too divided nationally. The prescription was simple and radical. They insisted that the bank stuff -more than 120,000 workers- should learn to talk and work out of the hierarchy with a focus in internal open conversations rather than communication segregated by nation or department.
As part of this wave of rediscovery, with workers rediscovering their own environment and the future living inside and around it, the bank financed the first book series of collected of essays by living authors released under Public Domain in Europe. The books, on such at-the-time arcane subjects as P2P systems, the sharing economy, and workers’ transnational cooperativism, were both free for download as ebooks and as a paper edition. The commercial success of the print version was a rare and surprising success in the Spanish editorial scene: even though everybody had the option to have them for free as e-books, thousands of copies of every single title were sold in traditional bookshops.
However, anarchist transnationalist organization was a bit too much for the bank in the long run. The “Innovation Department” who contracted las Indias closed (their members were all promoted) and the bank turned progressively towards a flashier policy of buying dotcom businesses and trying to integrate them into the existing organization. Emphasis on internal conversation was decreased and emphasis on promoting external blogs and marketing was increased. In 2010, after a few years as a successful but then orphaned experiment, they closed the internal blogosphere, the first massive conversational space in a big worldwide organization.
The bank weathered Spain’s financial crisis in 2008 relatively unscathed. Las Indias suspects that the reflection and innovations fueled by the open conversations had outside of the structure of the hierarchy helped them to avoid dangerous policies then common in other banks. Las Indias walked away from the project, but with a recognized and salable experience that later opened doors for them to more big institutions and businesses of the European Union and Latin America.
We are excited that you are considering coming to the Community Matchmaking event we are organizing at the BUZ at 778 Bergen St in Brooklyn on October 18th. This email has several things in it
- Schedule of events
- Suggestions for the Potluck Brunch
- Fictitious (almost correct) workshop descriptions
- A bit about the Point A project which is hosting the event.
10 to noon Potluck brunch and discussion of workshops
12:30 to 1 Discussion about Point A in NYC and what we have learned so far
1 to 2 Meet The Communities/Collectives session
2 to 3:30 first workshop block – the one we are asking you to be in
3:30 to 4 Group discussion and harvesting actionable stuff from w/s block if any
4 to 5 community speed dating
5 to 5:45 free networking
5:45 til 6 next steps and evaluation.
Pot Luck Brunch – This optional get together before the content portion of the event would happily help feed you. Please do not bring bagels or coffee (we have that covered) or salsa and chips (since folks always bring that). Please do feel especially encouraged to bring vegetarian, vegan, and gluten-free options.
Workshops – These are approximations of what workshops will be given by which of our many allied groups. Actual content may vary.
Can a residential worker collective become a commune? [Presented by the 3B collective – Brooklyn Bed and Breakfast] Workers collectives are critical alternative economic engines for community business. The success of the 3B collective should be inspiring to other folks interested in breaking out of the regular work-a-day world.
Should community be afraid of artists? [Presented by someone from Flux Factory] A huge fraction of New Yorkers consider themselves artists. And many collective projects have collapsed because artists involved needed to extract themselves from the group effort to pursue their artistic vision. What at the possibilities for collaborative art? How can collectives embrace artists?
How do you income-share in NYC? [Presented by someone from Ganas Community on Staten Island] One of the few income sharing communities in NYC tells the story of what they did to succeed and the current challenges they face.
How to Start an Eco-Village [Presented by folks from the forming Catalyst Ecovillage in Warwick NY] What are the important trade offs in designing an eco-village? What assistance programs are available to help finance forming eco-villages? What design principals and decision making systems have worked well?
Swarms to find housing: lessons from occupy [Presented by James Andrews of OWS] Bees and Ants have complex systems for finding or relocating hives. These models have useful lessons which were being investigated and modified for humans towards the end of the Occupy.
Free Schools & Kids learning in Community [Presented by Go Collective and Twin Oaks Community Unicorn School] Is curriculum optional? Can student directed learning prepare kids for state required standard of learning tests? What does homeschooling look like from inside an intentional community.
i barely follow the renewable energy scene. People often send me news articles they think are interesting. i feel like this part of the revolution is actually progressing quite well, so it needs less of my attention. Something which did catch my eye was a recent EcoWatch story called: 25 Top Companies Investing in Solar This quote caught my eye:
Combined, these blue chip companies have deployed 569 MW of solar capacity at 1,100 locations—a 28 percent increase over a year ago and a 103 percent increase since 2012, when the first report was released.
569 MW installed capacity is less than 1/6 of a reactor (with 35% capacity factor for the PV). But what is important here is that these are non-utility players and that the amount doubled in two years. That would be 5 reactors worth in the next 10 years (the same as the current expected amount of nuclear power that will come on line in the US is all the utility based reactors under construction are completed on time – which is quite unlikely).
But doubling is crazy fast. At this rate by 2025 we will have replaced all the reactors currently running in the US with non-utility renewables power. And by 2030 (in this very unlikely scenario) we will have a fully renewable grid nation wide. Even if the nuclear industries most ambitious plans are realized, we will only have a twenty new reactors in this period, failing to keep up with the retirement of aging ones in the US fleet.
So the next time someone tells you that renewables can’t ramp up fast enough, you should observe nuclear power cant even replace it’s dead.
How the nuclear industry tries to convince us that despite having no constituency it should be influencing our democratic decision process.
Originally posted on GreenWorld:
Regular readers of GreenWorld know that we have dropped a lot of digital ink writing about Nuclear Matters, the astroturf group launched by Exelon early this year to try to make the case to save the utility’s aging and uneconomic nuclear fleet.
Exelon and the PR firm Sloane and Company that runs the public end of Nuclear Matters have assembled a seemingly potent team of paid-for spokespeople to make the utility’s case: former Senators like Evan Bayh and Judd Gregg; former DOE secretary James Abraham; and the big catch, former EPA Administrator, Obama climate czar, and current League of Conservation Voters board chair Carol Browner.
These and others in Nuclear Matters’ assembled-team of backers have been writing (or, more likely, allowing their names to be used…
View original 1,308 more words