The China deception and the Renewables Myth

While the hundreds of protests world wide on the Fukushima anniversary were gratifying.

The thing which really floated my boat was the Economist magazine saying that for safety and cost reasons, the Nuclear Renaissance was dead.

They were careful to point out some countries will continue to build, especially those who are interested in diverting technology for weapons use.   But the decisions makers who read this magazine will see this writing on the wall, “fortunes not to be made here” and they will trundle off to the next mega-project.

But the bottom line is that cheap gas (especially from fracking) and a poor safety record are the demise of nuclear in the near term, and the near term may flush the nuclear engineers needed for their to be a long term.

One of the other great things which came out of this first anniversary is the Greenpeace Fukushima lessons learned report.  And in even the summary of this report are two facts which the pro-nuclear kids often want you to miss.

The China Deception is the pro-nuclear stance that the west should be more like China and invest in an ambitious nuclear program.  Nuclear proponents often point out that there are 25 reactors under construction in China (and only 2 in the US) as proof that we need to “catch up” .  In fact, if China completes all the proposed reactors it will represent about less than half of their proposed wind expansion.  For China to do doing nuclear at all, means they will do it in a big way and in a much smaller way than real renewables.

Similarly, worldwide over the last 5 years the installed capacity for renewables is 22 time more capacity than reactors:

Mature, robust and affordable renewable energy technologies are available and up to the task of replacing hazardous nuclear reactors. During the last five years, 22 times more new power generating capacity based on wind and solar was built (230,000MW) compared to nuclear (10,600MW). Renewable power plants built in just the one single year of 2011 are capable of generating as much electricity as 16 large nuclear reactors.

So when people tell you renewables are not ready to replace the big boy of nuclear power, you can politely reply that they already have.

Tags: , ,

About paxus

a funologist, memeticist and revolutionary. Can be found in the vanity bin of Wikipedia and in locations of imminent calamity. buckle up, there is going to be some rough sledding.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: