I have a complaint about science as the current principal truth model. For science to function you have to have repeatable experiments and you have to be able to measure things. For many things which i think are important (revolutions and romances jump to mind) both repeatability and measurability are impossible. There are no good metrics and they are often chronologically unique. This does not make science in itself bad, but it certainly causes distortions, where we focus on less important things because we can “get more truth” over there.
Similarly, the mainstream promoted values of self reliance and independence have negative side effects. The commercial interpretation of self reliance and independence is that you need to uniquely own everything you need to survive and thrive. This leads to tremendous idle capacity. Which leads to the accelerated degradation of the planet.
Some years back the globalization fans were fond of calling it a TINA proposition. There is No Alternative. This is a catchy name for a profound failure of imagination. Globalization is the current flavor of industrial capitalism which feeds our insatiable need for stuff. When i talk with mainstream audiences, the idea of affluent people consuming less to save the planet for future generations it goes over pretty poorly. Even the most radical of audiences think that voluntary austerity is an anti-gravity proposition. But then i pull out my trick question.
“What if i told you that you could work less and have access to more wealth and resources (and save the world as a secondary side benefit)? This often gets people’s attention. Especially busy people, who are already pressed for time, think this might be a lovely solution and they want to know more.
The principal thing which stops people from living this more luxurious lifestyle is trust. Because we are generally unwilling to trust other people with your stuff, everyone has to have their own everything. And almost all of it sits idle almost all the time. If alternatively we can trust each other, then we can share. This is not a trivial proposition. There is logistical leg work, like avoiding brittle sharing agreements, including scheduling and routine or catastrophic repairs.
And this is where community comes in. More important than any of the products of our cottage industries make, communities are trust building engines. We are not perfect, certainly and some are much better than others. But at their core communities share things, both socio-cultural and material. These cultures help us share and build trust.
We don’t have units to measure trust. There is little critique of “self reliance” and it’s associated idle resources. But there is an alternative. If you are interested in this low hanging fruit of a better world, i would encourage you to strongly consider coming to this years communities conference. August 29th thru Sept 1, 2014 at Twin Oaks in Virginia.
About paxusa funologist, memeticist and revolutionary. Can be found in the vanity bin of Wikipedia and in locations of imminent calamity. buckle up, there is going to be some rough sledding.
- Unity in the Communities Movement August 19, 2018
- Ecovillage Design – An experts perspective August 16, 2018
- Nomadic Communitarians July 24, 2018
- Labor Day Workshops at Cambia July 16, 2018
- Love Letters to Strangers July 14, 2018
- Communities building Co-ops July 5, 2018
- Don’t Buy Land First June 24, 2018
- Why you need to watch Fox News June 17, 2018
- Bicyclist’s Diary May 30, 2018