How Sanders lost New Hampshire

Bernie Sanders supporters were understandably happy that their candidate had a crushing electoral victory  over Hillary Clinton.  Sanders won more votes than any other candidate in a presidential primary.  Three times more than Obama in 2008 and 31% more than the previous record holder Republican John McCain back in 2000.

But he did not win the all important Democratic delegate count in the New Hampshire Primary.  This is because the party controls “Superdelegates”, most of whom were pledged even before the first ballot was cast.  Sanders will get at least 13 delegates based on the votes that he got.  But Hillary will get at least 15 based on her votes plus her super delegates.  And in case you have forgotten your high school civics class, votes don’t matter in terms of who gets nominated, delegates do.

benandjerrysbernie22_600x400

It is worth noting (as Nate Silver does in his clever piece on superdelegates) that unlike the delegates, which come from votes in a primary, super delegates can change their minds.  Here is what happened in 2008 when the majority of super delegates were pledged to Clinton and then Obama took off in the primaries.

superdelegates-1

Super means you can switch

But as Silver points out, this is far less likely to happen with Sanders.

Clinton begins with a far larger superdelegate lead over Sanders than she ever had over Obama. It’s easy to imagine why they might resist switching, furthermore. Unlike Obama, who was perhaps roughly as “electable” as Clinton, Sanders is a 74-year-old self-described socialist. Unlike Obama, who had the chance to become the first black president, Sanders is another old white guy (although he would be the first Jewish president). Sanders wasn’t even officially a Democrat until last year. I’m not saying these are necessarily great arguments, but they’re the sorts of arguments that Clinton-supporting superdelegates will make to themselves and one another, in part because the superdelegate system was created precisely to help nominate candidates considered more electable by party leaders.

The superdelegates system has existed in what is basically its current form since 1984. It was inspired by the desire to keep outsiders (like Trump and Sanders) from securing the parties nomination.  And in this year’s election, this is exactly how it is working.  It may well lead to Trump splitting from the Republican party, which would likely shatter that party’s chances to win the presidency.

This system is in place to make sure the party controls which candidate gets nominated.  Perhaps you think this is unfair.  Welcome to politics in America.

hillary with a gun

What part of “inevitable” are you not understanding?

Tags: ,

About paxus

a funologist, memeticist and revolutionary. Can be found in the vanity bin of Wikipedia and in locations of imminent calamity. buckle up, there is going to be some rough sledding.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Lecturas para comenzar el Sábado 20 de febrero de 2016 - February 20, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: